Ronald Lauder: holdings couldn't be fully reconciled (difference of 88,311,516 shares). A footnote describes a transfer or distribution between related entities, but the amounts could not be matched to the balance change. Largest: +80,437,628 shares on Nov 3, 2025 (LAL Family Partners L.P). Filing, Nov 3, 2025
Footnote: "There is no exercise or conversion price for the Class B Common Stock. Shares of Class B Common Stock may be converted immediately on a one-for-one basis by the holder and are automatically converted into Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis upon transfer to a person or entity that is not a "Permitted Transferee" (as defined in the Issuer's Restated Certificate of Incorporation) or soon after a record date for a meeting of stockholders where the outstanding Class B Common Stock constitutes less than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Issuer. | LAL Family Partners, L.P."
Barry Sternlicht: minor difference of 17 shares. Difference is under 0.5% of holdings.
Inferred rename: "LAL Family Corporation" is treated as the same holder as "LAL Family Partners L.P", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (6,558,604 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Decendents of the RSL 1996 Trust" is treated as the same holder as "Descendants of the RSL 1996 Trust", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (6,364 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "FN" is treated as the same holder as "(1)", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (136,796 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Decendants of RSL 1996 Trust" is treated as the same holder as "Decendents of RSL 1966 Trust", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (6,364 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Spouse" is treated as the same holder as "Evelyn H. Lauder", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (780,000 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Zinterhofer Aerin Lauder Trust u/a/d 4/24/00" is treated as the same holder as "Aerin Lauder Zinterhofer Trust u/a/d 4/24/00", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (9,865,090 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Gary M. Lauder 2000 Revocable Trust" is treated as the same holder as "WPL GRAT, as Co-Trustee", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (736,882 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "1992 GRAT f/b/o WPL" is treated as the same holder as "1992 GRAT f/b/o GML", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (736,882 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "WL GRAT" is treated as the same holder as "WPL GRAT, as Co-Trustee", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (3,829,216 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "GL GRAT" is treated as the same holder as "GML GRAT, as Co-Trustee", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (2,687,692 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Decendents of RSL 1966 Trust" is treated as the same holder as "Decendants or RSL 1966 Trust", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (6,364 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Trust Under Article 2 of The Zinterhofer 2008 Descendents Trust Agreement dated December 24, 2008" is treated as the same holder as "Trust under Article 2 of The Zinterhofer 2008 Descendants Trust Agreement u/a/d December 24, 2008", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (4,810,594 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "1992 GRAT Remainder Trust f/b/o WPL" is treated as the same holder as "1992 GRAT Remainder Trust F/B/O William Lauder", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (1,268,304 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "1992 GRAT Remainder Trust f/b/o GML" is treated as the same holder as "1992 GRAT Remainder f/b/o Gary M. Lauder", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (24,360 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Judith Glickman Lauder" is treated as the same holder as "Spouse of LAL", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (10,000 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Jane A. Lauder 2003 Revocable Trust" is treated as the same holder as "Jane A. Lauder 2003 Trust", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (17,161,020 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Trustee" is treated as the same holder as "Through a grantor retained annuity trust", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (12,000 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Through a grantor retained annuity trust established February 2020" is treated as the same holder as "Through a Grantor Retaned Annuity Trust", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (15,000 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred rename: "Through a grantor retained annuity trust" is treated as the same holder as "Through a grantor retained annuity trust established in May 2020", because the old name was never reported again and the new one opened with the same balance (14,655 shares). Old name, new name
Inferred typo: the share class "Class A Common Strock" is treated as the same class as "Class A Common Stock" on 1 holding line, because the two spellings are nearly identical and each balance carried over exactly. Example (Ronald Lauder, 2,026,338 shares): old title, new title
Inferred typo: the share class "Class A Comon Stock" is treated as the same class as "Class A Common Stock" on 1 holding line, because the two spellings are nearly identical and each balance carried over exactly. Example (Sara Moss, 41,098 shares): old title, new title
External context: we only cite outside events when a documented connection exists. None is shown for this period.